Not All Gerrymanders are Bad

Attacking gerrymandering these days is as popular as saying Wall Street needs reform. It’s a truism; everybody agrees with that “gerrymandering is bad,” just as everybody agrees that breathing is good.

Gerrymanders do get pretty ridiculous. Consider Maryland’s 3rd congressional district:

Maryland’s legislature designed this gerrymander to favor Democrats. And it worked: Maryland is represented by seven Democrats and one Republican.

You can probably go search a few terrible gerrymanders of your own; they’re not exactly difficult to find. For the purposes of this post, however, I will be concentrating on one particular gerrymander: Arizona’s 2nd congressional district.

Here is how it looks:

Most observers will probably label this example as just another egregious attempt to favor one party or the other. One look at that incredibly strange-looking right arm certainly adds credence to this theory.

Arizona’s congressional districts, however, are drawn by an independent redistricting committee, not the state legislature. The purpose of this gerrymander is distinctly different from what most casual observers would first presume.

Take a look at Arizona’s Indian reservations:

That brown-colored northeast reservation perfectly matches Arizona’s 2nd district. It’s the Hopi Indian reservation. Completely encircling it is the Navajo Indian reservation, colored in blue.

The Hopi and Navajo tribes have a long history of conflict and land disputes. Having both tribes represented by one congressman would be inappropriate; Arizona’s Independent Redistricting Commission therefore gerrymandered its districts to separate the tribes.

The lesson here is not that gerrymandering is good, but that it can be used for good. 99% of gerrymanders are probably bad; the practice badly needs reform. But we ought be wary when labeling anything as universally negative, lest we forget the other 1%.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Election Analysis and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Not All Gerrymanders are Bad

  1. Sushen kr.biswas says:

    It is a great deception with the democracy and its democratic people of a nation to gerrymander electoral districts or region. I deeply hate the democracy that approves of this filthy tricks for political parties.
    sushen biswas

  2. sandboxwalls says:

    Thought provoking. Federal Courts have encouraged gerrymandering to create Majory Minority Districts. The Courts consider this a good use of gerrymandering, and look the other way from Political Party gerrymandering unless the smell gets really bad.

    • inoljt says:

      Yep. Tends to hurt Democrats, because black or Latino-majority districts essentially pack Democratic voters into one district.

  3. Polprav says:

    Hello from Russia!
    Can I quote a post in your blog with the link to you?

  4. Hey, I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say GREAT blog!…..I”ll be checking in on a regularly now….Keep up the good work! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s