A First-World Crisis

The recent troubles faced by Greece bring to mind a fascinating way in which this financial crisis has been different from so many others. Namely, it has been the wealthy, Western countries that have been hit hardest and who have been made to look bad.

It was troubles in the United States, the world’s preeminent economic power, which first initiated the recession. Its sophisticated, modernized financial system self-destructed in a manner previously thought only possible in places like Indonesia or Argentina. For the first time since the Great Depression, First-World banks were in danger of falling; Great Britain even had an old-fashioned bank run.

And it was rich Westernized Iceland that was the first to collapse. Not some Latin American Argentina or Asian Indonesia – but Iceland. Today the country is still in financial chaos – an Icesave bill to restore stability has proven deeply unpopular, much like the bail-out bill for the banks. The bill is being put into a national referendum, where it will almost certainly lose.

Indeed, all of Europe has suddenly seemed vulnerable. In Eastern Europe, countries from Hungary to Estonia have been closely scrutinized, their finances built upon weak foundations. For a while Ireland appeared similarly weak, until its government enacted a set of bills to reduce debt. Now analysts are wondering about the Mediterranean PIGS (Portugal, Italy, Greece especially, and Spain). It looks like Germany will bail out Greece, to the fury of its citizens.

Meanwhile, the Third World has largely stayed above and out of the fray. China’s economic growth only briefly dipped from 13.0% to 9.0%, and practically no Third World countries have experienced financial crises of the type that roiled Iceland or the United States.

It seems that one legacy of the global recession may be to help close the gap between the rich and poor in the world. On the other hand, not all countries would benefit. Africa, for instance, is still plagued by the same problems that have beset it for generations. Finally -and quite unfortunately for the United States – more worldwide equality would probably lessen its relative power. What is good for the world is not always good for us, and vice versa.

This entry was posted in Foreign Affairs and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A First-World Crisis

  1. crisismaven says:

    You’re right – the OECD states had applied far more leverage and their central banks lavished far more money on their economies than the rest of the world dared or were able to. Which helpsexplain, that now these “developed ” nations are more prone to collapse than the former scapegoats.

    • inoljt says:

      That’s very true; if there’s anything this crisis has convinced me of, it’s that deregulated active banks are a gigantic No.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s