Why Didn’t Britain Ever Give Democracy to Hong Kong?


Great Britain is a democracy and a country dedicated to helping spread liberty around the world.

At least today. There used to be a time when Great Britain was not a friend to democracy. Indeed, there used to be a very undemocratic thing called the British Empire.

One of the last great British colonies was a city called Hong Kong. Hong Kong stayed under British control for far longer than its other colonies, and Hong Kong was still painted in the pink of the British Empire long after the rest of the empire was gone. Indeed, Hong Kong was still British long after the idea of empire began to be thought of as something very negative.

But there is something very strange about what the British did with Hong Kong, or rather what the British did not do. That is, for the longest time Great Britain never attempted to introduce democracy to Hong Kong. In the end, Hong Kong never did become a democracy under Great Britain. It is not a democracy today.

Now, this would be more easily explained if it happened before the Second World War. Before World War II, of course, it just wasn’t the European way to give democracy to their colonies. But Wikipedia’s page on Democratic development in Hong Kong doesn’t start until the 1980s. This was long after decolonization and the idea that empires were good. Indeed, the first elements of local autonomy in Hong Kong were introduced with the agreement to give back sovereignty of Hong Kong to China.

Why did Great Britain never make Hong Kong a democracy? Why didn’t it do this in the 1960s or 1970s? Why did it continue appointing bland British bureaucrats, who had never lived there and knew nothing about the place, to run Hong Kong? It seems that this failure has something to with the continuing British nostalgia of empire.

In America today people are not proud of America’s colonies. They’d rather forget it. You can talk to an American for a lifetime, and the subject of the Philippines will never come up. Indeed, the last time I actually talked with an American about American colonization escapes me. But talk with a British person long enough, and eventually the subject of the British Empire will always come up. Probably they’ll even speak in a half-nostalgic tone about the days of Britain’s glory. They’d do it again if they could.

Hong Kong’s political system today is a strange thing. People in Hong Kong vote in free and fair elections, they can protest and assembly, but the rules are bent so that ultimately only the Chinese government’s candidate can win. Yet, ironically, Hong Kong today is more democratic than it was during the vast majority (perhaps the totality) of its time under British rule. This is doubly ironic, because Great Britain is a democracy and China is not.

If Great Britain had had the option of ruling Hong Kong as long as it pleased, would Hong Kong today be a full democracy? Maybe not. Probably not.

Would Hong Kong even be as democratic as the not-really democracy it is today?

Probably so. But perhaps not. Even the “perhaps” is quite disturbing.

This entry was posted in Asia, Europe and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Why Didn’t Britain Ever Give Democracy to Hong Kong?

  1. answerer says:

    Let me explain this to you, before the recent decade, Hong Kong’s economy and politics was doing better than China, due to a democratic method of ruling and capitalist ideals introduced of free economy, the focus of private business enterprises, and letting the rich be rich, and poor be poor. Although the British government ruled over Hong Kong, what money you made was made was yours. However this was not the case in China. In China, everything was owned by the communist government, and they could do whatever they wanted to your property, money, family and YOU however they liked. The economy was also controlled by the govnt, so was the money. In Hong Kong, everything was free-flow, there was actual opportunity for people to keep what they earned. So your argument of Hong Kong having never been a democracy is provincial and invalid. Hong Kong’s LAWS are democratic, however there is no universal suffrage due to the OBVIOUS fact it was a former colony, and now returned to China. Hence, everything is line that Hong Kong people want to be able to control their own economy and enterprise in their capitalist ways, instead of having confused, semi-foreign, communist China poking their way in and messing around.

  2. Brandy Clinton says:

    There maybe a lot of reasons why didn’t allow democracy, but look at Hong Kong now, they’re economy has sky rocketed off the roof . Whatever the reason is, I’m sure it is for the better of the country.

    • inoljt says:

      I’m actually quite curious. If you were an adult during the 1960s or 1970s or early 1980s, what was the thinking about giving democracy to Hong Kong?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s